Ramasami v. Muthusami

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.02.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Ramasami 2.Geetha @ Anitha 3.Minor Pugalendhi Represented by his guardian/father Ramasami 4.Rajathee 5.Chinnakannu @ Ramayee ... Appellants Vs.

1.Muthusami 2.Selvi 3.Govindaraj 4.Aravind 5.Nirmala 6.Radha 7.Rani 8.Srinivasan 9.Chinnannan 10.Ravikumar 11.Sathya 12.Madammal

13.Rathinammal 14.Chinnakkannu @ Rajammal 15.Krishnasami 16.Sumangali 17.Chinnaraju 18.Salapathy 19.N.Srinivasan 20.P.Iyyananar 21.R.Rajasekaran ... Respondents Prayer : Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2011 in O.S.No.11 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court II), Salem.

For Appellants :

Mr.R.Nalliyappan

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment was delivered by S.S. SUNDAR, J.) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants reported "no instructions" stating that he could not contact his client, despite intimation to them. Since the learned counsel himself expressed his difficulty in reaching the appellants and the communication addressed to the appellants is stated to have been returned with an endorsement "refused", this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served if the matter is adjourned.

2.Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 3.Registry is directed to communicate a copy of the judgment to the known address of the appellants as well.

(S.S.S.R., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 08.02.2023 mkn Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court II), Salem.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.S. SUNDAR , J.

and P.B. BALAJI , J.

mkn 08.02.2023