Madras High CourtCRL OP/1702/2022dismissed

B.Chakkaravarthysriraman v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police

2022-02-01Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar2 pages

Crl.RC.No.1702 of 2022 Crl.R.C.No.1702 of 2022 V. SIVAGNANAM, J.

Admit.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not an accused in the case relating to Cr.No.95 of 2000 on the file of respondent police. He would further contend that the petitioner's father name is Ramu and he belongs to Melagundalapadi village, but in final report, the names of his father and native village varies.

3. The learned Govt. Advocate (crl. Side) who takes notice for the respondent police is directed to file a report regarding the identity of the petitioner and whether this petitioner is arrayed as an accused in Crime No.95 of 2000 on the file of Puduchathiram Police Station, Cuddalore District, since the petitioner claims that he is not an accused in the abovesaid crime number.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.RC.No.1702 of 2022 V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

msr

4. Post this matter on 31.01.2023.

5. In the meantime, the Registry is directed to call for the records from the trial court on or before 31.01.2023.

02.01.2023 msr Crl.R.C.No.1702 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis