← Library
Madras High CourtOP/90/2024dismissed for nonprosecution

Abizer N.Rangwala v. Sakina

2026-06-12Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.Maria Clete2 pages

OP No. 90 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE OP No. 90 of 2024 Abizer N.Rangwala S/o.Noorudin Rangwala, No.2/3, Francis Joseph Street, 4th Floor, Next to NIIT Parrys, Chennai - 600 001.

Now at R/at B-605, Urban Space, Sr.No.25, Corinthian Club Road, Internal Road, Dorabjee Paradise, Mohammedwadi, Pune, Maharashtra - 411048.

..Petitioner(s) Vs Sakina D/o.Mr.Mohammedul Bakir Vadnagarwala, R/at No.50, 3rd Floor, Armenian Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 7, 9 and 25 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 r/w clause 17 of letters patent of 1865 praying that a) the Petitioner be granted the joint custody of minor daughters Hussaina Abizar Rangwala (Age 17 years) and Munira Abizar Rangwala alias Zahra (Age 13 years) from the sole custody of the Respondent b) that the petitioner be granted the title of legal guardian of person as well as legal guardian ship rights upon the petitioner's minor daughters Hussaina Abizar Rangwala (age 17 years) and Munira Abizar Rangwala alias Zahra (age 13 years). For Petitioner(s):

No appearance For Respondent(s):

Sasi Kumar.K __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

OP No. 90 of 2024 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

dpq

ORDER

When the matter was listed for hearing on 30.04.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 12.06.2026. When the matter is called today i.e., 12.06.2026 there is no representation for the petitioner and hence it is clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Original Petition.

2. Hence, this Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

12-06-2026 Index: Yes/No dpq __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis