Madras High CourtAS/985/2009dismissed for default

Saroja v. Muthukumarasamy

2020-03-11Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 11.03.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM A.S.No.985 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Saroja ..Appellant

Versus

1.Muthukumarasamy 2.Arumugam 3.Rajamani 4.Thirumurugan 5.Vasanthi 6.Nallusamy ..Respondents First Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.60 of 2001 dated 29.04.2009 on the file of the Additional District Court, Puducherry. For Appellant :

Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondents :

Mr.T.Susindran for R1, R2 & R5 Mr.R.Thirugnanam for R4 R3 not ready No appearance for R6 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

Despite sufficient opportunities were given to the appellant to bring the Legal Heirs of the deceased first respondent, no steps have been taken so far. Today, it is represented that the appellant also died. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Additional District Court, Puducherry.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras +1cc to Mr.S.Sounthar, Advocate, S.R.No.21831 +1cc to Mr.R.Thirugnanam, Advocate, S.R.No.21448 A.S.No.985 of 2009 RK(CO) RN(30/05/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/