Kamatchiammal v. Thiru

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN C.M.A.No.604 of 2005 1.Kamatchi Ammal 2.Prakash (Minor) 3.Devi (Minor) 4.Balaji (Minor) 5.Thirumal 6.Sivapushanam ...Appellants vs 1.Kaliyavarathan Partner in Sri Vengateswara Modern Rice Mill, Pappanapattu, Villupuram Taluk & District.

2.Magadevan Partner in Sri Vengateswara Modern Rice Mill, Pappanapattu, Villupuram Taluk & District.

3.S.Loganathan

...Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madras-600 006 in W.C.No.147 of 1993 dated 10.02.2003.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

It is seen from the case records on 06.09.2019, the learned counsel for the appellant represented that 'he has returned the papers and is no longer appearing for the appellants'. The case was earlier adjourned to 10.09.2019, 12.09.2019 and thereafter 20.09.2019. On 20.09.2019, Court directed the registry to post ____________ Page No 1 of 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the case under the caption 'for dismissal' on 23.09.2019. On perusing the records on 24.09.2019 it was noticed that the appellants have not taken any steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased/first respondent.

2. Today( i.e.) 18.10.2019 when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution with liberty to restore the same. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rri To 1.The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Salem. 2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras. C.M.A.No.604 of 2005 nmi(co) nr 17/12/2019 ____________ Page No 2 of 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/