Madras High CourtCRL OP/1180/2021dismissed

Sardar v. State Rep By,

2021-01-29Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of January Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1180 of 2021 1 SARDAR [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 4] 2 RIZWANA BEGUM 3 SAHURA BEGUM 4 TAHURA BEGUM Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, W-16,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PULIANTHOPE,CHENNAI - 600 012.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S.S.ANURADHA BALAJI Advocate For Respondent : M/S. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) IPC in Crime No.Not known of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Today, When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that so far, there is no case registered against the petitioners and only, petition enquiry in C.S.R No.456 of 2020 is pending against the petitioners.

3. Therefore, recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as premature.

-sd/- 29/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, W-16,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PULIANTHOPE, CHENNAI-600 012.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.S.ANURADHA BALAJI Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.1180/2021 Date :29/01/2021 MN-08/02/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/