K.Saravanakumar v. The District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WMP.Nos.366, 9289, 3025, 1239, 1831 and 3008 of 2019, K.Saravanakumar .. petitioner in WP.No.362 of 2019 1.K.Kalaimathi 2.B.Savitha 3.M.Uma 4.G.Shanthalakshmi 5.K.Gayathri 6.U.Vasugi 7.K.S.Jayaprakash 8.P.Manoharan 9.J.Mohanakrishnan .. Petitioners in WP.No.1097 of 2019 vs

1. The District Revenue Officer Chennai.

2.Mrs.Girija .... respondents in WP.No.362 of 2019

1. The District Revenue Officer Chennai.

2.M.Vinothkumar 3.R. Kalaipandian 4.Pasupathi 5.R.Rajeshwari 1/4

6.G.Gowri 7.J.Jessie Sujatha 8.R.Jayapreetha 9.N.Nithya (R2 to R9 are impleaded vide order dated 24.01.2019 in WMP.No.1846/2019) ... Respondents in WP.No.1097 of 2019 Common Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent made in A2/007/2018 dated 02.01.2019 to quash the same in so far as the petitioner and the 2nd respondent is concerned.

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Dinesh in both cases.

For Respondents : Mr.C.Gauthamraj, for R1 in both cases.

M/s.R.Arthi for R2 in WP.362/2019.

COMMON ORDER Mr.V.Dinesh, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in both the writ petitions does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petitions have become infructuous.

2/4

2. Recording the same, both the writ petitions are closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

18.08.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No tsh To

1. The District Revenue Officer Chennai.

3/4

T. VINOD KUMAR , J.

tsh 18.08.2025 4/4