P.Marappan v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.04.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP No.10377 of 2015 P.Marappan ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep by Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Palladam Police Station, Tirupur District.

... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,to direct the respondent to investigate the matter and register the case against the said person in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 01.02.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

Seeking a direction to the respondents police to Register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 01.02.2015, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police.

3. It appears that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party in respect of the sale of the property and that the opposite party had been given the commission due to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner lodged the present https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

complaint. On a reading of the complaint, it does not disclose the commission of any cognizable offence, hence, no positive direction could be given to the respondent to register a case. Hence, this petition is closed with the liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the manner known to law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Lok Adalat) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsm To

1. Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Palladam Police Station, Tirupur District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi, Advocate, S.R.No.22175 Crl.OP No.10377 of 2015 SR(CO) CA(13/05/2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/