← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11573/2013disposed of

K.Kishore Kumar v. The General Manager,

2020-07-16Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.Nos.11573 and 11574 of 2013 K.Kishore Kumar

...Petitioner in W.P.11573/2013

V.P.Srinivas

...Petitioner in W.P.11574/2013

Vs.

The General Manager Erode District Co-Operative Milk Producers' Union Limited Vasavi College Post Erode 638 316.

...Respondent in both W.Ps.

Prayer in W.P.No.11573 of 2013:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the terminal benefits to the petitioner by considering the representations dated 14.03.2006, 26.09.2008 and 12.11.2008 along with interest from the date of acceptance of resignation with effect from 19.08.2003.

Prayer in W.P.No.11574 of 2013:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to sanction the terminal benefits to the petitioner along with interest from 15.01.2005 as on date based on the representation dated 10.12.2011.

For Petitioners : M/s.A.R.Nixon For Respondent : Mr.K.N.Pandian C O M M O N O R D E R The petitioners have filed these writ petitions seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the terminal benefits to the petitioners by considering their representations, along with interest, from the date of acceptance of resignation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The petitioners are employees of the respondent and they were appointed during the year 1988. After putting several years of service, the petitioners opted to resign from their service and their resignation was also accepted by the respondent. The grievance of the petitioners is that though their resignation was accepted by the respondent during the years 2003 and 2005 respectively, their terminal benefits have not yet been settled. In this regard, the petitioners made representations to the respondent, however, the same have not yet been considered. Hence, these writ petitions. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondent to dispose of the petitioners representations, within a reasonable time frame.

4.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioners representations and to pass appropriate orders on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if they have not yet been disposed of. The petitioners are directed to send a copy of their representations to the respondent along with a copy of this order.

5.The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To The General Manager Erode District Co-Operative Milk Producers' Union Limited Vasavi College Post Erode 638 316.

W.P.Nos.11573 and 11574 of 2013 PPA(CO) KKV/13/08/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/