← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/101/2020dismissed for not pressed

K.Kuppuswamy v. The Foremean

2025-10-10Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.R.P No.101 of 2020 and C.M.P No.622 of 2020 K.Kuppuswamy

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Foreman Jayapriya Chit Funds (P) Limited Head Office at Neyveli Cuddalore District.

2.P.Manikandan 3.R.Rajendran 4.N.Dhanavelu 5.The Chief Manager/Finance Accounts Centre/Mine-I TPS-I Extension N.L.C Limited, Neyveli.

...Respondents

PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the docket order dated 08.11.2019 made in E.P No.253 of 2009 in A.R.No.308 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Neyveli, by allowing this civil revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Agilesh For R1 : Ms.D.Brindha for Mr.C.A.Anburaja For R5 : Mr.P.Ajay Vignesh for Mr.N.Nithanandam For R3 : No Appearance

R2 & R4 : Not ready in notice

O R D E R

Mr.R.Agilesh, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioner and Ms.D.Brindha, representing Mr.C.A.Anburaja, learned counsel on record for the 1st respondent and Mr.P.Ajay Vignesh representing Mr.N.Nithanandam, learned counsel on record for the 5th respondent are before this Court.

2. Mr.R.Agilesh, representing counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the matter is settled between the parties and he does not press this civil revision petition. To that effect, the learned counsel has made an endorsement.

3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel on record for the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.10.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order uma To The Subordinate Judge, Neyveli

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

uma

C.R.P No.101 of 2020 & C.M.P No.622 of 2020 10.10.2025