The Managing Director v. Sisili

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU C.M.A.No.1620 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 1.The Managing Director, M/s.Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Division-4,Palani division, Madurai.

...Appellant Vs 1.Sisili, W/o.Anthony Samy 2.K.Krishnakumar, S/o.Kalimuthu 3.T.Robert, S/o.Thomas 4.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office No.4 A, 4th Floor, Thirumalai Towers, Door No.723, Avinachi Road, Coimbatore.

5. P.Sethuram Driver, TNSTC, division - 4, Madurai.

[R-5 Driver given up]

...Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Decree and Judgment dated 20.11.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.1491 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and Sub Court, Coimbatore and to set aside the same.

For Appellant : Mr.D.Raghu For R1 and R3 : Mr.A.Sivaji

JUDGMENT

The appellant, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation has filed this appeal challenging the negligence and quantum of compensation in the Award dated 20.11.2006.

2. The first respondent herein is the injured claimant. She filed MCOP.No.1490 of 2005 claiming a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- for the injuries she sustained in the accident that occurred on 11.05.2005. As per the averments in the claim petition, on 11.05.2005, when the claimant was travelling in a Honda Santro car bearing Registration No.TN-38-S3848, a Government bus bearing Registration No.TN 57 N 1100 belonging to the fifth respondent and driven by the fourth respondent herein, came in a rash and negligent manner in the opposite direction and hit the car; as a result of which the claimant, who was travelling in the car, sustained grievous injuries.

3. Before the Tribunal, the claimant and the Insurance Company/R-4 let in evidence, both oral and documentary. The driver of the bus/the fifth respondent herein has also been examined as D.W.2 and he has not filed any documentary evidence. After going through the entire evidence, the Tribunal based on the evidence of P.W.1 and the contents of Ex.A.1 copy of FIR and Ex.P.2 Final Report filed in the above case, the Tribunal has held that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the car bearing Registration No.TN-38S3848 and the Government bus bearing Registration No.TN 57 N 1100 belonging to the appellant.

4. The above finding is based on the evidence and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the finding in respect of negligence is confirmed.

5. Insofar as the injuries sustained by the first respondent/first claimant is concerned, the Tribunal has taken into account Ex.A.14-Wound certificate and Ex.A.Nos.22, 23 and 25 X-rays and Ex.A.No.24 X-ray report and came to the conclusion that the first respondent/claimant sustained grievous injuries and the Tribunal awarded the compensation under following heads:- Sl.No .

Heads under which compensation grated by the Tribunal Amount of compensation granted in Rs.

1.

For Transportation Rs. 1,000/- 2.

For nourishment Rs. 2,000/- 3.

For medical expenses Rs. 60,000/- 4.

For injuries Rs. 12,000/-

Sl.No .

Heads under which compensation grated by the Tribunal Amount of compensation granted in Rs.

5.

For Pain and sufferings Rs. 9,000/- 6.

Total Rs. 84,000/-

6. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal cannot be held to be either excessive or arbitrary. But it is a just compensation and in such view of the matter, this Court finds no infirmity in the Award of the Tribunal, warranting any interference and accordingly, the Award passed by the Tribunal is confirmed.

7. By order dated 06.07.2013, this Court while ordering interim stay of operation of the award, directed the appellantTamilnadu State Transport Corporation to deposit 50% of the Award amount with accrued interest. Since this Court confirmed the Award passed by the Tribunal, the appellant is directed to deposit the balance Award amount with accrued interest and costs. On such deposit, the 1st respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount lying in the deposit along with interest and costs without filing formal petition before the Tribunal.

8. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To

1. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and Sub Court, Coimbatore

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court.

+1cc to Mr.D.Raghu, Advocate, S.R.No.15687 C.M.A.No.1620 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 JPL[co] NSK/10/06/2022