Tharabai v. Munirathinammal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1899 of 2000
1. Tharabai
2. Chandradhayan
3. Chandramouli
4. Sankar Ganesh
5. Saravanan
6. Chandra Kumar
7. Saraswathy (minor) (rep by her mother and guardian the 1st appellant)
8. Jayaraman ... Appellants Vs.
1. Munirathinammal
2. Anburaj ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree dated 19.07.2000 and made in A.S.No.126 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.07.1999 and made in O.S.No.873 of 1991 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai.
For Appellants : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondents : R1 and R2 set exparte
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that he is reporting no instructions for the appellants. Memo recorded. The appellants called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Vv https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
1. The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.
2. The Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
S.A.No.1899 of 2000 SPD(CO) GMY(27/06/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/