L. Mahendhiran v. V. Chandran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN L.Mahendhiran ... Appellant ...Versus...

1.V.Chandran 2.Manjula Chandran 3.N.Ramesh Kumar

...Respondents

PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.7800 of 2011 dated 24.02.2016 on the file of the learned IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant ::

No appearance For R1 & R2 ::

No appearance For R3 ::

Mr.K.Rajasekaran ********* 1/3

J U D G M E N T

Initially, the appellant was represented by one Advocate Mr.T.Sundar Rajan. Since he made a representation that as per the instruction from the appellant, he has withdrawn his appearance. RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., nvi

2. By an order dated 16.04.2024, this Court had appointed Mr.T.V.Sai Srujan , learned counsel for the appellant. On 28.06.2024, the learned Legal Aid Counsel represented that since he has received instruction from the appellant that the appellant is interested in engaging a private counsel, his nomination by the High Court Legal Services Authority was withdrawn. Today there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

3. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

2/3

05.07.2024 nvi Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order:Yes/No To 1.The IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. Judgment in AS.No.580 of 2016 3/3