Aravind, A2 v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20081 of 2018 *ARAVINDHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (L&O), P2 OTTERI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
CR.NO.437 OF 2018.
For Petitioner : M/S.D.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MS.P.KRITIKA KAMAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner seeks bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 397 and 506(ii) I.P.C, on the file of the respondent police.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner along with another waylaid the defacto-complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1500/- from the cash box at knife point and run away from the place of occurrence.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent has submitted that no previous case is pending against the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration of the period of custody and substantial investigation is over, I am inclined to grant the bail upon the following conditions:-
(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Egmore, Chennai and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. (ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness during trial.
(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial (iv) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Trial Judge is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Trial Judge himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs.State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] (v) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A I.P.C.
-sd/- 14/08/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
* PETITIONER NAME IS AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN CRL.MP.NO.11178/2018 IN CRL.OP.NO.20081/2018 DATED 24/08/2018 TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.V, ALLIKULAM, EGMORE, CHENNAI 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (L&O), P2 OTTERI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI +1CC to M/S.D.MURUGAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 15279 SR.No.15928 CRL OP.20081/2018 Date :14/08/2018 cm 14/08/2018 THS : 24.08.2018