Ganesan. v. Kuppusamy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.751 of 2000 1.Ganesan 2.Sabapathy 3.Manirathinam 4.Muthukumar ... Appellants /Vs/ 1.Kuppusamy 2.Ponmudi ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment of the Principal Subordinate Judges Court, Nagapattinam, passed in A.S.No.21 of 1999 dated 30.03.1999 upholding the decree and judgment of the District Munsif Court, Thiruthuraipoondi passed in O.S.No.239 of 1989 dated 26.03.1996.

For Appellants : No appearance

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for hearing on 03.10.2018, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 04.10.2018 i.e., today. Even today, when the matter is listed for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants.

2. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dna https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judges, Nagapattinam.

2. The District Munsifs, Thiruthuraipoondi.

S.A.No.751 of 2000 mg(co) nr 29/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/