Madras High CourtCRL OP/648/2022dismissed

K.Murugan v. State Rep By

2022-01-12Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twelfth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.648 of 2022 K.MURUGAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-3, NUNGAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI (CRIME NO.795/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.R.SURENDAR KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who was arrested on 11.12.2021 and remanded to judicial custody on 13.12.2021 for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 427, 387, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.795 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and threatened him with broken beer bottle and also snatched a sum of Rs.1,500/- from him at the knife point. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 25 days from 13.12.2021. Hence, the learned counsel would pray for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise strong objection stating that the petitioner is a history sheeter and he has got 9 previous cases out of which, one murder case was registered and would submit that if he is released on bail he may tamper the evidence.

5.Considering the grave nature of offence and the fact that the petitioner has got 9 previous cases and one murder case was registered, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 12/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-3, NUNGAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.D.PERCIVUL PERICLES Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.648/2022 Date :12/01/2022 RVR 31/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/