R.Karthikeyan v. Sri Arulmighu Arunachaleswarar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.01.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN SA.No.884 of 2000 and CMP.No.8058 of 2000 R.Karthikeyan ..Appellant/2nd Defendant Vs.

1.Sri Arulmighu Arunasalaswarar Devasthanam, Thiruvannamalai by its Executive Officer 2.R.Balasubramaniyan 3.Dr.Shanmuga Sundari 4.Sivasankari ..Respondents/Plaintiff & Defendants 3 to 5 PRAYER:

The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 02.08.1999 in A.S.No.76 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Thiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1998 in O.S.No.441 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : No appearance - not ready in notice

JUDGMENT

The second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 02.08.1999 in A.S.No.76 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Thiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1998 in O.S.No.441 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.

2. When the matter was listed on 09.01.2020, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on 13.01.2020 under the caption "for dismissal". Even today(13.01.2020), no representation for the appellant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Additional District Judge, Thiruvannamalai 2.The Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.

Copy to : The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

AKM/02.03.2020 /2P-4C/ SA.No.884 of 2000 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/