← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10220/2016disposed of

V.T.Maheshkumar, v. The Managing Director,

2016-03-18Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.10220 to 10223 of 2016

1. V.T.Maheshkumar [Petitioner in W.P.No.10220/2016]

2. V.Muthusamy [Petitioner in W.P.No.10221/2016]

3. R.Mathialagan [Petitioner in W.P.No.10222/2016]

4. K.Rathinam [Petitioner in W.P.No.10223/2016] Vs.

1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636 007.

2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

[Respondents in all W.Ps.] Prayer:

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to settle all the terminal benefits due and payable to the petitioners with interest at 12% per annum with effect from 31.01.2014, 30.06.2014, 31.5.2014 and 30.4.2015 respectively within the time stipulated by this Honble Court. For Petitioner in all W.Ps :Mr.A.Selvaraju For Respondents in all W.Ps :Mr.R.K.Gandhi,* COMMON ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.R.K.Gandhi, learned Counsel, who took notice for the respondents and with their consent, the main writ petitions are taken up for hearing.

2. These writ petitions have been filed seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to settle all the terminal benefits due and payable to the petitioners with interest at 12% per annum with effect from 31.01.2014, 30.06.2014, 31.5.2014 and 30.4.2015 respectively.

3. The petitioners initially were appointed as Record Clerk in the first respondent Corporation and retired from service on 31.01.2014, 30.06.2014, 31.5.2014 and 30.4.2015 respectively, on reaching the age of superannuation. Their grievance is that they have not yet been paid the terminal benefits.

4. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioners in these Writ Petitions is for a larger extent, the learned counsel for the petitioners confined his relief to the limited extent of directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners.

5. Hence, the respondents are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners individually on 14.3.2016, on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. The writ petitions are disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

ajr Sd/- Asst.Registrar dt. 5.4.2016 Corrected order to be issued in WP.No.10220 to 10223/16 /true copy/ Sd/- Asst.Registrar dt. 7.4.2016 Sub Asst. Registrar

To

1. The Managing Director, State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, No.12, To be Substituted to order Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636 007.

already despatched on 06.04.20164 2.The Administrator Corporation (Salem) Ltd. Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

+ 4 cc to M/s.Mr.A.Selvaraju, Advocate Sr 17628 to 17631. KR/5/4/16 Eu 11.04.16 W.P.Nos.10220 to 10223 of 2016