Samuvel v. The State Rep.By Its, The Sub Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Samuvel

2. Sugumar @ Naveen ... Petitioners Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Ranipet District.

Crime No.464 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.464 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners :

Mr.M.Rajinikanth For Respondent :

M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

1/6

The petitioners herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 296(b), 115(2), 329(4), 351(2) of BNS in Crime No.464 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.12.2025 due to money dispute, petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked with deadly weapons, due to which, defacto complainant sustained injuries . Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

2/6

5. Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and petitioners are not having any previous cases, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioners shall report before the 3/6

respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 29.01.2026 sma To

1. Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Ranipet District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/6

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 5/6

29.01.2026 6/6