S.Paramdaman v. State Rep. By Its
Crl.O.P.No.10216 of 2016 P.KALAIYARASAN, J.
The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147 and 506[ii] of I.P.C., on the file of the respondent police, in Crime No.148 of 2016, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused gave assurance to marry the de facto complainant and had intercourse with her. But the accused did not keep up his words and had cheated her .
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged about 28 years, he is an innocent and that this case has been falsely foisted and therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent opposed this application contending that the investigation is not yet completed.
P.KALAIYARASAN, J.
gya/gv
5. Considering the age of the petitioner as well as the de facto complainant, nature of the offence and also considering the fact that the petitioner is having permanent residence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 05.05.2016 gya/gv Crl.O.P.No.10216 of 2016