Senthil Kumar v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirtieth day of January Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.537 of 2020 1 SENTHIL KUMAR [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 MADASAMY Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB, TIRUPPUR CITY POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.6 OF 2017.

For Petitioner : M/S. J.JAWAHAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.IYYAPPARAJ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 420 of IPC, in Crime No.6 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are father and son. The second petitioner is a retired police officer. The petitioners collected Rs.14,50,000/- from the defacto complainant for securing Government job. But, later the petitioners neither secured job nor repaid the money to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant against the petitioners before the respondent police. 3.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners without disclosing that they have already been granted anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.16115 of 2018 dated 20.08.2018 and without complying with the conditions imposed in the earlier order have come forward with the second anticipatory bail petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.

Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am inclined to extend the time for executing security and complying condition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on condition of payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authority, High Court, Madras, failing which anticipatory bail granted by this Court shall stand vacates automatically without any further reference.

5.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.

-sd/- 30/01/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB, TIRUPPUR CITY POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

COPY TO THE TAMIL NADU LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, HIGH COURT, MADRAS, CC to M/S. J.JAWAHAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.537/2020 Date :30/01/2020 MK:18/02/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/