Madras High CourtCRL OP/19724/2015closed

V.Subramani v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-12-08Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 08.12.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.OP.No.19724 of 2015 AND W.P.No.3822 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 V.Subramani ..Petitioner in both cases Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 2.The Inspector of Police Kandhikuppam Police Station Kandhikuppam Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri ..Respondents in Crl.O.P.19724 of 2015 1.The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 2.The Superintendent of Police Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk Krishnagiri 4.The Inspector of Police Kandhikuppam Police Station Krishnagiri District 5.The President Balaenayanapalli Village Panchayat Bargur Panchayat Union Krishnagiri Taluk and District 6.Perumal 7.Krishnamoorthy 8.Krishnamurthy

9.Kumar 10.Perumal 11.Rajamanickam ..Respondents in W.P.No.3822 of 2015 Prayer in Crl.O.P.No.19724 of 2015 Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register the FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 19.05.2015. Prayer in W.P.No.3822 of 2015 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action based on the representation of the petitioner dated 15.12.2014 against the private respondents 6 to 11 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation for the mental agony caused to the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Prabakaran in both cases For Respondent/s :

Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, APP in both cases C O M M O N O R D E R It is seen that the petitioner had addressed a representation to the District Collector, Krishnagiri District on 15.12.2014 and has thereafter, filed the instant writ petition and a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 19.05.2015.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and perused the materials placed on record.

3. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner has got remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if a complaint is not registered by the police.

In view of the above, both these petitions are closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner known to law. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Gya

To 1.The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 2.The Superintendent of Police Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk Krishnagiri 4.The Inspector of Police Kandhikuppam Police Station Krishnagiri District 5.The President Balaenayanapalli Village Panchayat Bargur Panchayat Union Krishnagiri Taluk and District 6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+2ccs to Mr.C.Prabakaran, Advocate SR. Nos.65195, 65196 CRL.OP.No.19724 of 2015 and W.P.No.3822 of 2015 KG (CO) PR (16/12/2021)