Rajini v. Saratha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.24602 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Rajini 2.Sentamarai 3.Malliga 4.Lakshmi 5.Rasathi 6.Kumudha 7.Kalaiselvam 8.Malliga

...Petitioners/Respondents

Vs.

Saratha

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the complaint in D.V.A.No.15 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruppur and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Arun Dattan for Mr.C.Munusamy

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the present petition has become infructuous. He has also made the following endorsement to that effect:

"As per the instruction of my client, the DVA case itself disposed. Hence, the Crl.O.P may be closed." https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(JJ Act) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar hvk To The Judicial Magistrate I, Tiruppur.

Crl.O.P.No.24602 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 NMI(CO) CSR:12.02.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/