← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2182/2022dismissed

S.Sattanathan v. State Of Tamil Nadu

2022-02-17Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.NO.2182 OF 2022 AND WMP.NO.2348 AND 2351 OF 2022 S.Sattanathan.

..Petitioner Vs.

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -600009.

2. The Director of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Saidapet, Chennai-600015.

3. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Rural Development, Krishi Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi -110001.

4. Social Audit Society of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Director, Panagal Maaligai, West Saidapet, Chennai - 600015.

5. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, O/o. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India, Pocket -9, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, New Delhi -110124.

..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the

Notification No. .. Nil dated 23.12.2021 for selection for the appointment to the post of Director, Social Audit Society of Tamil Nadu, Chennai issued by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and to implement the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in W.P.No. 16329 of 2019, dated 13.02.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.Sai Srujan for M/s. Giridhar and Sai For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan, AAG Assisted by Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Spl.GP - R1,R2 & R4

O R D E R

Challenging the notification issued by the 2nd respondent, dated 23.02.2021 calling for selection for the appointment to the post of Director, Social Audit Society of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, the present writ petition has been filed on 07.01.2022.

2. Heard both sides and perused the documents available on record.

3. When this writ petition was taken up for hearing on 09.02.2022, the learned Additional Advocate General informed this Court that pursuant to the notification dated 23.12.2021, totally 127 applications were received by the department and on scrutinising the said applications, all the 127 applications did not satisfy the required qualifications as prescribed in the said notification, therefore, they could not proceed with the aforesaid selection process.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the stand taken by the respondent that no candidates were selected to the said post, the present writ petition challenging the said notification will not give effect. Hence the learned counsel for the petitioner made request before this Court to grant liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate forum.

5. In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

6. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to seek remedy before the appropriate forum, if necessary.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -600009.

2. The Director of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Saidapet, Chennai-600015.

3. The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Rural Development, Krishi Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi -110001.

4. The Director, Social Audit Society of Tamil Nadu, Panagal Maaligai, West Saidapet, Chennai - 600015.

5. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, O/o. The Comptroller & Auditor General of India, Pocket -9, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, New Delhi -110124.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.10736 W.P.No.2182 of 2022 and WMP.No.2348 and 2351 of 2022 GPL(CO) RLP(14/03/2022)