P.Perumal, v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu,
2024:MHC:2869
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2013 1.P.Perumal ... Appellant in WA.No.1669/2013 2.E.Johnson ... Appellant in WA.No.1670/2013 3.E.Sagunthala ... Appellant in WA.No.1672/2013 5.Murugesan ... Appellant in WA.No.1699/2013 Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Kancheepuram.
3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
4.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 005.
5.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Circle-II, Chennai - 600 119.
... Respondents in all WAs 6.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai - 45 ... Respondent in WA.No.1670/2013 Prayer in WA.No.1669/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1664 of 2011.
Prayer in WA.No.1670/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1385 of 2011.
Prayer in WA.No.1672/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1665 of 2011.
Prayer in WA.No.1699/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters
Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.3199 of 2011.
For Appellants : Mr.K.Balakrishnan (in all WAs) For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader (in all WAs) For R4 & R5 : Mr.B.Balaji Standing Counsel [For TNUHDB] (in all WAs) COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] With reference to the relief sought for in the present Writ Appeals, 'the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board' [erstwhile Slum Clearance Board] filed a status report, which would reveal that the alternate Tenements are provided to the Writ Appellants. The details regarding the allotment of Tenements provided to the appellants are detailed as under:- "12. I submit that following are the persons received the alternate accommodation from the board;
S.No.
Tenement No Allottee Appeal Case 1) AE-14 Mariappan WP.No.4936 of 2010 2) AE-15 A.Munusamy WP.No.4394 of 2010 3) AE-16 Selvi WP.No.4936 of 2010 4) AE-17 David WP.No.493 of 2010 5) AE-18 Venkatammal WP.No.4936 of 2010 6) AE-19 Ponni WP.No.4395 of 2010 7) AE-20 Michael WP.No.4395 of 2010 8) AE-21 Singaravelu WP.No.4394 of 2010 9) AE-22 Palanisamy WP.No.4394 of 2010
10) AE-23 Nalathambi WP.No.4936 of 2010
11) AE-28 Jayalakshmi WA.No.1936 of 2013
12) AH-58 Ranganathan WA.No.965 of 2013
13) Ah-59 Verramuthu WA.No.963 of 2013
14) AH-60 Jeyalakshmi WP.No.1386 of 2011
15) AH-55 Vijaya WA.No.546 of 2013
16) AH-56 Lalitha WP.No.3200 of 2011
17) AG-40 Amsa WP.No.1381 of 2011
18) AG-41 Muniyammal WA.No.544 of 2013
19) AG-42 Susila WA.No.2881 of 2012
20) AH-47 M.Murugesan WA.No.1825 of 2013
21) AB-2 E.Anitha WA.No.1842 of 2013 The above persons were allotted alternative accommodation in the Perumbakkam Ezhil Nagar scheme.
13. I submit that as stated supra, the board has issued allotment vide Board Proceedings G9/4799/2013 dated 12.12.2014 to the rest, of 50 persons for the alternative
accommodation, but till date they have not come forward to receive the same from the Board. In compliance of the direction of this Hon'ble Court passed in the writ petition to issue alternative accommodation to the Writ petitioner, the Board has taken necessary steps in order to comply the order of this Hon'ble Court and the same was complied in true spirit and Board has issued alternative accommodation to the respective eligible persons.
14. I submit that, the following are the 50 persons who have not come forward to receive allotment order from the Board and have filed the writ appeal for the alternative accommodation till date and has directed by this Hon'ble Court the Board is ready with the tenements since 12.12.2014." Board Proceedings No.G9/4799/2013 dated 12.12.2014 S.No.
Petitioner / Appellant Details of the Case 1) Sivashanmugam W.A.No.543/2013 2) Haja Mohideen W.A.No.545/2013 3) Vijaya W.A.No.546/2013 4) Kumar W.A.No.966/2013 5) Lakshmi W.A.No.967/2013 6) Johnson W.A.No.1670/2013 7) Perumal W.A.No.1669/2013 8) Sagunthala W.A.No.1672/2013 9) Gomathi W.A.No.964/2013 10) Murugan W.A.No.1699/2013 11) Yasmin W.A.No.1820/2013 12) Sivanandam W.A.No.1871/2013 13) Raj Kumar W.A.No.1837/2013
S.No.
Petitioner / Appellant Details of the Case 14) Vanaroja W.A.No.1836/2013 15) Asen W.A.No.1838/2013 16) Shamugam W.A.No.1815/2013 17) Raman W.A.No.1839/2013 18) M.Yasmin W.A.No.1840/2013 19) Naseera Begum W.A.No.1866/2013 20) Sankar W.A.No.1843/2013 21) Dhilsath Begum W.A.No.1867/2013 22) Natarasan W.A.No.1841/2013 23) Stephen W.A.No.1822/2013 24) Karpagam W.A.No.1823/2013 25) Manarsamy W.A.No.1824/2013 26) Inbasekar W.A.No.1826/2013 27) Shamsudeen W.A.No.1827/2013 28) Abdul Khader W.A.No.1829/2013 29) Suresh W.A.No.1828/2013 30) Fazial Hussain W.A.No.1870/2013 31) Babu W.A.No.1816/2013 32) Nabeesath W.A.No.1831/2013 33) Selvakumar W.A.No.1830/2013 34) Meharunnisa W.A.No.1832/2013 35) Yosuf Sheik W.A.No.1863/2013 36) Khaleel Ibrahim W.A.No.1864/2013 37) Saroja W.A.No.1818/2013 38) Sabiya W.A.No.1819/2013 39) Raja Mohammed W.A.No.1817/2013 40) Rahmathunnisa W.A.No.1821/2013 41) Sabiral Beevi W.A.No.1834/2013 42) Rahimath Beevi W.A.No.1862/2013 43) Mohammed Jalal W.A.No.1861/2013 44) Rajendran W.A.No.1833/2013
S.No.
Petitioner / Appellant Details of the Case 45) Muthu W.A.No.1860/2013 46) Ganeshan W.A.No.1835/2013 47) Shanmugam W.A.No.1859/2013 48) Mala W.A.No.1865/2013 49) Piranmalai W.A.No.1868/2013 50) Mohammed Raffiq W.A.No.1869/2013
2. The writ appellants, on payment of beneficiary cost, the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board will allot Tenement to the writ appellants by following due process. Therefore, the writ appellants are at liberty to pay the beneficiary cost to the Urban Habitat Development Board and on receipt of payment, the allotment is to be made. In respect of the appellants, who have already been allotted tenement are not entitled to seek any further allotment.
3. In view of the fact that the Urban Habitat Development Board is providing alternate allotment to all the writ appellants, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken in respect of the grounds raised in the present Writ Appeals. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
[S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.] 05.07.2024 (1/2) Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order To 1.The Secretary, The Government of Tamil Nadu Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Kancheepuram.
3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Tambaram, Kancheepuram District.
4.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 005.
5.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Circle-II, Chennai - 600 119.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
Jeni 05.07.2024 (1/2)