S.Manimekalai v. Arumugam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.10.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and MP.Nos.1 of 2010 (3 Nos.) 1.

S.Manimekalai 2.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., 773 A, Dalporiantal Complex, Salem-1.

...Appellants in all C.M.A's.

Vs.

1.

Arumgam 2.

Selvaraj 3.

...Respondents in C.M.A.No.998 of 2010

Vs.

1.

Malar 2.

...Respondents in C.M.A.No.999 of 2010

1/5

Vs.

1.

M.A.Mohammed Sultan 2.

...Respondents in C.M.A.No.1000 of 2010

Prayer in C.M.A.No.998 of 2010: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.170 of 2004, dated 29.10.2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Mettur. Prayer in C.M.A.No.999 of 2010: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.41 of 2005, dated 24.10.2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Mettur. Prayer in C.M.A.No.1000 of 2010: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.78 of 2005, dated 24.10.2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Mettur. In all C.M.A's.:

For Appellants : Mr.E.Rajadurai for Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan For Respondents : Not ready Notice, for R1 & R2 : No Appearance, for R3 2/5

COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved in all these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are similar in nature, they are disposed of by way of this common order.

2. These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed as against the orders passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Mettur in M.C.O.P.Nos.170 of 2004 and 41 & 78 of 2005.

3. When the matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions and thereby sought for adjournment.

4. However, considering the long pendency of these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, it is evident that the learned counsel for the appellants is not interested to prosecute the matters and therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals pending.

3/5

5. Accordingly, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals stand dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

17.10.2023 skt NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No To:

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

4/5

skt and MP.Nos.1 of 2010 (3 Nos.) 17.10.2023 5/5