S.Nila Lakshmi, Typist Grade-I v. The Principal Secretary To

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 31.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.12001 of 2013 and W.M.P.No.10971 of 2016 1.S. Nila Lakshmi 2.K. Jayalakshmi 3.R. Ramakrishnan 4.V. Shanmugam 5.S.P. Nagarajan 6.P.S. Mahadevan 7.M. Balakrishnan 8.R. Narasimhan 9.H. Ramachandran 10.K. Manian 11.N. Navaneetham 12.R. Thambi Durai 13.G. Damodaran 14.M. Rajaram 15.H.E. Sanjeeviraj 16.F.J. Paul 17.S. Bharnabas 18.C. Palaniappa 19.M.K. Venkatesan 20.M. Raju 21.H. Rajendra Rao 22.N. Kujithapatham 23.S. Kaliyaperumal 24.K. Natarajan 25.M.R. Alagappaer 26.K.S. Ramamurthy 27.M.A. Muthalif 28.V. Thiruvengadam 29.M. Parvathi 30.A. Somu 31.L. Peter Paul 32.R. Purushothaman 33.R. Krishnan 34.K. Arumugam 35.P. Lawrence 36.S.K. Balakrishnan 37.V. Thangaraj 38.S. Sambasivam 39.R. Malayappan 40.S. Selvanayagam 41.A. Ramachandran 42.M. Selvarajan 43.K. Kothandaraman

44.N. Rajavelu 45.M. Surali Velu 46.A. Sethuraman 47.K. Prema 48.V. Vijayalakshmi 49.K. Sukumaran 50.N. Selvaraj 51.A. Venkatachalam 52.M. Dhasthageer 53.L. Arthur godwin 54.K. Marimuthu 55.A. Chellapillai 56.V.K. Manimaran 57.R. Ramanujam 58.M. Sankaran 59.P. Nedumaran 60.M. Augustine Jeyapaul 61.S. Mariappan

62. Francis Samuel 63.K. Subbiah 64.S. James Raj 65.N. Robert 66.R. Rajasekaran 67.P. Karuppiah 68.S. Mahimai Doss 69.A. Paramasivan 70.V. Ramamoorthy 71.R. Saroja 72.C.R. Madivanan 73.K. Gopal 74.G. Durairaj 75.N. Sankaranarayanan 76.N. Munuswamy 77.B. Zeenath hm(retd) 78.T.S. Dasappa 79.A.R. Nagarajan 80.E.N. Annamalai 81.S. Sethuraj 82.P. Ramamoorthy 83.S. Rajagopalan 84.V. Thirunarayanan 85.V. Singaram 86.M. Sadasivam 87.V. Kulandhai Velu 88.M. Mariappan 89.V.N. Kongayya 90.R.S. Shanmuganathan 91.N. Anandan 92.S. Annapoornam 93.A. Swaminathan 94.C. Muthu 95.S.R. Arumugam 96.K. Muniyandi 97.R. Chidambaram

98.M. Amjat Ibrahim 99.S. Vaikuntamani 100.S. Shanmuga Velu 101.R. Muthuvelu 102.R. Paramasivam 103.E. Neelamegam 104.M.C. Rajendran 105.V. Anandhan 106.A. Gopal 107.Y. Devanesan

108. Kamalanathan 109.T. Duruvan 110.K. Sambasivam 111.G. Loganathan 112.D. Hendry 113.S. Segaran 114.M. Nithyanandam 115.K.P. Angamuthu 116.K. Selvamani 117.V. Sampath 118.S.A. Venkatesan 119.R. Periasamy 120.P. Kuppusamy 121.M. Raju 122.K. Sahadevan 123.A. Sundararaj 124.M. Mohamed Seethu 125.R. Chinnadurai 126.S. Nagalakshmi 127.K.A. Lakshmanan 128.S. Kannan 129.K.P. Sivalingam 130.K. Kasinathan 131.C. Somasundaram 132.V. Arumugam 133.R. Selvanathan 134.G. Ganesan 135.R. Jayaram 136.G. Kaliya Perumal 137.M.P. Jacob 138.V. Krishnan Kutty 139.J. Felicita John 140.S. Gunamani 141.V. Samuel 142.S. Vetha raj 143.R. Sreedharan Nair 144.R. Doraisamy 145.K. Vasudevan 146.S. Sundararajan 147.A. Pangaraj 148.R. Shanmugam 149.K. Sivagami 150.J. Leela 151.V. Prema

152.K.K. Palanisamy 153.K.N. Devaraj 154.N. Velusamy 155.G. Krishnakumar 156.S. Ramasamy 157.G. Rajarathinam 158.T. Logammal 159.P.V. Balaraman 160.P. Anushya 161.R. Balakrishnan 162.M. Rangasamy 163.K. Baskaran 164.P. Ramalingam 165.R. Anbunathan 166.V. Kanniyappa Reddy 167.K. Srinivasan 168.N. Purushothamman 169.A. Paramanandan 170.V.K. Venugopal 171.R. Pandian 172.S. Devaraj 173.N. Arumugam 174.G. Narayanasamy 175.A. Venkatesan 176.A. Muthu 177.M. Kishnamoorthy 178.S. Sakthivel 179.R. Arumugam 180.A. Mani 181.M. Gunaseharan 182.I. Shanmugam 183.K. Loganathan 184.S. Ragavendra Rao .. Petitioners Vs.

The Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu Finance (Pension) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

.. Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the claim of the petitioners for the sanction of increment due to them on 1st January, 1st April 1st July and 1st October on their completion one full year of satisfactory service in terms of FR 26 despite their retirement on superannuation on 31st December, 31st March, 30th June and 30th September.

For petitioner :

Mr.R. Rengaramanujam For Respondent :

Mr.S. Thangavel Special Government Pleader -----

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No Cost. Consequently, connected W.M.P.No.10971 of 2016 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msm To The Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pension) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

+1cc to Mr.R.Rengaramanujam, Advocate SR.No. 7761 +1 cc to Spl Government Pleader Sr.No. 8144 W.P.No.12001 of 2013 A.SK(04/03/2020)