P.Arivazhagan v. The State Rep. By

Crl.O.P.No. 1 0 2 6 5 of 2 0 1 6 P.KA LAIYARA S A N. J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.106 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner is alleged to have attacked the de-facto complainant with hands and caused injury.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been treated as out patient. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is having permanent residence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

P.KA LAIYARA S A N. J.

rrg

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Chennai, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. rrg 0 4. 0 5. 2 0 1 6 Crl.O.P.No. 1 0 2 6 5 of 2 0 1 6