M/S Sri Raghavendra Tyres v. Arulmighu Rathnavinayagar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.11.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN C.M.S.A.No.30 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M/s.Sri Raghavendra Tyres Rep. By its Proprietor Mr.K.Raj No.19, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

....Appellant versus Arulmighu Rathnavinayagar & Durgaiamman Thirukoil, Rep. By its Executive Officer, No.28, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

...Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Order 21 Rule 97 of C.P.C., read with Section 100 of CPC., against the Judgment and decree of the Decree of the learned IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in A.S.No.400 of 2009 dated 15.07.2010 confirming the Fair and Decreetal order passed by the learned IX Assistant Judge, City Civil court, Chennai in E.A.No.5064 of 2005 in E.P.No.3529 of 1992 in O.S.No.7534 of 1983, dated 26.08.2009.

For appellant : No appearance For respondent : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was came up for hearing on 11.11.2019 and 19.11.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant as well as the respondent. Hence, Registry was directed to post the matter today under the caption "for dismissal".

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the respondent. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rli To

1. The IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The IX Assistant Judge, City Civil court, Chennai. C.M.S.A.No.30 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 BS(CO) SP(27/12/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/