Madras High CourtCRL OP/867/2023allowed

S.Sairakesh v. Inspector Of Police

2023-01-19Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.01.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN S.Sairakesh ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.The State rep by Inspector of Police, TIW St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District.

(Crime No.541 of 2016) 2.A.C.Kuppuswamy.

.. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Crime No.541 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent Inspector of Police, TIW St Thomas Mount, Police Station, Chennai for the offences under Section 279 and 337 of IPC and quash the same.

1/5

For Petitioner :Mr.C.Muthu For Respondents :Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal side) for R1 Ms.T.Nagapushpam, for R2

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in Crime No.541 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent Inspector of Police, TIW St Thomas Mount, Police Station, Chennai for the offences under Section 279 and 337 of IPC and quash the same.

2. When the matter is taken up today, a joint memo is filed by the petitioner and the second respondent stating that they settled the issues amicably between the petitioner and the de facto complainant and they do not want to proceed further with this case. Further the de facto complainant requires the quashing of the proceedings in Crime No.541 of 2016.

2/5

3. Today, the petitioner, second respondent/de facto complainant and the injured, Mr.Manikandan are present before this Court. This Court enquired with them, especially enquired Mr.Manikandan. The petitioner, second respondent and injured Mr.Manikandan reiterated that they resolve their dispute and the second respondent and the injured Mr.Manikandan does not want to proceed further with this case and he has no objection to quash the proceedings in Crime No.541 of 2016.

4. Recording the above submissions, the proceedings in Crime No.541 of 2016 is quashed. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the terms of the joint compromise memo filed by the petitioner and the second respondent.

19.01.2023 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No nsa 3/5

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villlupuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4/5

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J., nsa 19.01.2023 5/5