Murali Prasad v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifteenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.959 of 2021 1 MURALI PRASAD [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] 2 RAJA SETTU Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUCHETTYCHATRAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT (CRIME NO.118/2020) For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : M/S.T.SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- When the matter was taken up for hearing on 11.02.2021, there was no representation for the petitioners and hence, the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal '. 2.Even though, the matter is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', neither the petitioners nor their counsel is present to prosecute the matter. Hence this petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
-sd/- 15/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUCHETTYCHATRAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.C.E.PRATAP Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.959/2021 Date :15/02/2021 TA-26/02/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/