A.Thayammal @ Gnanasoundari v. Mrs Samundeeswari

A.S.No.412 of 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN A.S.No.412 OF 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 A.Thayammal @ Gnanasoundari (Not a necessary party since deceased on 02.08.2010) 1.A.Sargunaraj 2.A.Kanagaraj 3.A.Manuel Raj 4.A.Devaraj 5.Vimala 6.A.Felisi Rani 7.Jaya 8.S.Esther Selvaraj 9.A.Rita Premila ...Appellants vs 1.Mrs.Samundeeswari 2.Selvaraj 3.Shenbagavalli 4.M.S.Samraj 5.S.Rajasekaran 6.Rani 7.S.Chandra Sekar 8.Sundari 9.Ramathilagam 10.Prakashvel

...Respondents

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC to set aside and revise the judgment and decree dated 07.09.2010 made in O.S.No.3750 of 2009 on the file of VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai and allow this appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.S.No.412 of 2011 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

VRI For Appellants : Mr.S.R.Sundaram For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

The appeal was filed in the year 2011 arraying 19 respondents. For the past 10 years, service to the respondents not effected. When the matter was listed on 18.02.2022, the learned counsel for the appellant reported that he has no instruction from his client and he needs time to get instructions. Hence, the matter was listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellant is not able to provide any information about the appellant or any positive undertaking to serve on the respondents. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. 23.02.2022 vri To The VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

A.S.No.412 of 2011 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis