Kali @ Kalidasan v. State By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.540 of 2026 Kali @ Kalidasan ... Petitioner Vs.
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, D4 Zam Bazaar Police Station, Chennai.
(Crime No.304 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.304 of 2025 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, D4 Zam Bazaar Police Station. For Petitioner : Mr.C. Raja For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.11.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2),296(b), 115(2), 118(1),351(3) and 3(5) of BNS in Crime No.304 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of prosecution is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused and attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod and caused injuries to him. Hence, this case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and was in judicial custody since 22.11.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions submitted that the petitioner is having two previous cases. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials available on record.
2/6
6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and the nature of offence and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
[c] On breach of any of the aforementioned 3/6
conditions,the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283] [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
09.01.2026 smn Note :
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
4/6
To
1. The II Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Egmore, Chennai,
2. The Inspector of Police, D4 Zam Bazaar Police Station, Chennai.
3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal -II, Chennai. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
smn Crl.O.P.No.540 of 2026 09.01.2026 6/6