Madras High CourtCMP/49/2009allowed

V.R.Sivalingam Naidu v. S.Subbulakshmi Ammal

2025-09-08Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CMP NOs. 49, 50 and 51 OF 2009 in AS No. 857 of 2006 CMP No. 51 of 2009

1. V.R.Sivalingam Naidu S/o.V.M.Raji Naidu @ Raji Naidu, 2, Sivagami Nagar, Near Ajaya Arts And Science College, Tirunindravur-602 029 Appellant(s) Vs

1. S.Subbulakshmi Ammal W/o.D.S.Subrmanian, 49, Dr.

Ambedkar 38th Street, G.K.M.Colony, Jawahar Nagar, Chennai-82 P.P.Booshanam Ammal (died) 2.Vijayalakshmi @ M.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Damodaramurthy, 25, Mounasamy Madam Street, Villivakkam, Chennai3.G.Periyalwar 401, 11th Main First Block, Third Stage Manjunath Nagar, West Cherd Road, Bangalore-10 4.LATHA 401, 11th Main First Block, Third Stage Manjunath Nagar, West Cherd Road,

Bangalore-10 5.P.Keerthivasan 401, 11th Main First Block, Third Stage Manjunath Nagar, West Cherd Road, Bangalore-10 6.P.Murali 401, 11th Main First Block, Third Stage Manjunath Nagar, West Cherd Road, Bangalore-10 Respondent(s) CMP No. 49 of 2009 has been filed to condone the delay of 20 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in AS No.857 of 2006.

CMP No. 50 of 2009 has been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in AS 857 of 2006 CMP No. 51 of 2009 has been filed to bring on record the respondents 3 to 6 as legal representative of the deceased 2nd respondent as respondents 4 to 7 in AS No.857 of 2006.

For Petitioners:

M/s.V.K.Rajagopalan L. Robert Keenedy Ramesh R. Ramesh COMMON ORDER CMP No. 49 of 2009 has been filed to condone the delay of 20 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in AS No.857 of 2006.

CMP No. 50 of 2009 has been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in AS 857 of 2006

CMP No. 51 of 2009 has been filed to bring on record the respondents 3 to 6 as legal representative of the deceased 2nd respondent as respondents 4 to 7 in AS No.857 of 2006.

Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the respective petitions, the petitions are allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. 08.09.2025 (1/2) mst

S.SOUNTHAR J.

MST CMP Nos.49, 50 and 51 of 2009 in AS No. 857 of 2006 08.09.2025