R.Khalidhass v. The State Rep By

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

The Petitioner/accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477 r/w 34 of IPC in Cr.No.1 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of prosecution is that the defacto complainant is a cooperative society providing loans for agricultural purposes. During 2021, an enquiry committee has been created to enquire about the loans disbursed and waivers given to the same defaulter again and again in the defacto complainant co-operative society. The said enquiry committee held that financial malpractice has occurred for the tune of Rs.14,88,411/- during 2021 and alleged that the petitioner herein and four others were involved in the said offence. Hence the complaint.

3.Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would submit that this is a second anticipatory bail Petition and this Petitioner has already filed a Petition seeking anticipatory bail in Crl.OP.No.16344 of 2023 before this Court and this Court by a detailed order dismissed the same on 22.09.2023. 1/ 4

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the Respondent Police. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either sides and the fact that this Court has already dismissed the first anticipatory bail Petition filed by the Petitioner and there is no change of circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06.02.2024 sai 2/ 4

3/ 4

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

sai 06.02.2024 4/ 4