K.Rangasamy v. E.C. Romeo Christy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.517 of 2022 and Crl.O.P.No.19898 of 2021 K.RANGASAMY [ PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ] Vs 1 E.C.ROMEO CHRISTY [ RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 ] 2 R.USHA RANI 3 STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S-4, NANDAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI (CRIME NO.208/2021) Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Cancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the 1st and the 2nd respondent in Crl.OP.NO.19898/2021 in order dated 26.10.2021 pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S P.SATHIYA, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.BALAJI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- The petitioner has filed this Miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of Anticipatory Bail granted by this Court vide order dated 26.10.2021 to the private respondents/ 1st and 2nd respondents.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, this Court vide its order dated 26.10.2021 granted Anticipatory bail to the 1st and 2nd respondents / private respondents on condition that they have to deposit a sum of Rs.2,13,000/-(Rupees Tow Lakhs Thirteen Thousand only) to the credit of Cr.No.208 of 2021. However, the same was not complied with by the 1st and 2nd respondents / private respondents. He further submitted that, the notice to the private respondents has been returned with an endorsement "unclaimed". Hence, the present Miscellaneous petition is filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the private respondents.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions submitted that the 1st and 2nd respondents have not complied with the orders of this Court dated 26.10.2021.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

5. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel, since the 1st and 2nd respondents / private respondents have not complied with the order of this Court, the anticipatory bail granted by this Court vide order dated 26.10.2021 stands vacated.

6. Accordingly, this Miscellaneous petition is ordered. -sd/- 04/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, ALANDUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU. [FOR INFORMATION]

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDHAMPAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 C.C. to M/S A.P.SATHIYAMURTHY Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1976 Order in CRL MP.517/2022 & CRL OP.19898/2021 Date :04/02/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format RW 16/02/2022