S.Ganesan v. State Rep By, Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED AND CRL MP NO. 523 OF 2025 S.Ganesan S/o.Subramani, Conservancy Inspector, Placed Under Suspension, Division-28, Unit-5, Zone - Ii, Chennai Corporation Residing At No.96, 1st Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 118 Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By, Inspector Of Police Directorate Of Vigilance And Anti-corruption, Chennai.

Respondent(s) CRL MP NO. 523 of 2025 S.Ganesan S/o.Subramani, Conservancy Inspector, Placed Under Suspension, Division-28, Unit-5, Zone - Ii, Chennai Corporation Residing At No.96, 1st Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 118 Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By, Inspector Of Police

S/o.Subramani, Conservancy Inspector, Placed Under Suspension, Division-28, Unit-5, Zone - Ii, Chennai Corporation Residing At No.96, 1st Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 118 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

S.Xavier Felix F.Camilus Selva F.Jescintha Sheela M.Mubeen Shiek M.Muzzammil For Respondent(s):

Public Prosecutor (v & Ac) CRL MP NO. 523 of 2025 For Appellant(s):

S.Xavier Felix F.Camilus Selva F.Jescintha Sheela M.Mubeen Shiek M.Muzzammil Public Prosecutor (v & Ac) For Respondent(s):

ORDER

This criminal original petition is filed to call for the entire records pertaining dismissal of the common order in Cr.M.P.No.285 of 2024 in C.C.No.137 of 2011, dated 03.12.2024 on the file of the Special Court for

Prevention of Corruption Act, cases and set aside the same. Facts of the case in nutshell as per the petition:- 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is facing trial in C.C.No.137 of 2011 on the file of the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act, Cases, Chennai for the charges under Section 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and presently the trial is in defence side evidence. It is alleged that the petitioner had demanded bribe from the de facto complainant and this had prompted the de facto complainant to lodge a complaint before the respondent. The petitioner was trapped and is currently facing criminal proceedings. The complainant due to previous enmity had lodged false complaint against the petitioner and the same was already intimated in writing to the Assistant Commissioner of Vigilance and Anti Corruption along with supporting documents. Though, many petitions were filed raising these grounds, Crl.M.P.Nos.396 and 398 of 2023 was dismissed by the Special Court vide order dated 13.12.2023. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this criminal original petition.

3.

Mr.Shiek M.Muzzammil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial Court has already concluded the trial and convicted the petitioner vide order dated 20.01.2025. The appropriate observation of the judgement is reproduced here as under:

"42......

In result, accused is found guilty of commission of offence u/s7 and 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The accused is sentenced to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment and shall pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The accused is sentenced to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment and shall pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment under Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the P.C.Act 1988, the sentence of imprisonment imposed for each offence shall run concurrently. The period of sentence already undergone by the accused if any is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Total fine amount of Rs.1,00,000/-" .

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that there is no useful purpose to proceed the present case any further for the

relief as sought for and also submitted that the present petition may be dismissed.

5.

Mr.A.Gopinath, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), ascertained to this Court that the trial Court has already passed the above said order on 20.01.2025 and convicted and sentenced the petitioner. Thus no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceeding furthers in this case any more and hence, prayed for dismissal of this present petition. 6.

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 7.

After considering the arguments made by both the parties, it is clear that the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the accused/petitioner vide judgement and order dated 20.01.2025. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served in proceeding this case any more. Accordingly, this Criminal SHAMIM AHMED,J.

vca Original Petition is dismissed. Connected criminal miscellaneous petition is

closed. No order as to costs.

21.01.2025 vca Internet :

Yes/No Citation :

Yes/No To

1. State Rep By, Inspector Of Police Directorate Of Vigilance And Anti-corruption, Chennai. AND CRL MP NO. 523 OF 2025