The Government Of Tamilnadu v. C. Vaiyapuria
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 31.07.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and M.P.Nos.1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2015 W.A.Nos.67 and 68 of 2015 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by Secretary to Government Forest and Environment Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests having Office at Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet Chennai 600 015.
3.The District Forest Officer Vellore District.
4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu Office at DMS Compound, Teynampet Chennai - 600 018.
5.Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary Finance Department, Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.
.. Appellants in both the W.As -VsC.Vaiyapuri ... Respondent in W.A.No.67/2015 N.Vilvanathan ... Respondent in W.A.No.68/2015 order in W.P.Nos.6044 and 6056 of 2014 dated 28.02.2014. 1/5
W.A.Nos.86 and 87 of 2015 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by Secretary to Government Forest and Environment Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests having Office at Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet Chennai 600 015.
3.The District Forest Officer, Social Forestry Division, Vellore District.
4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu Office at DMS Compound, Teynampet Chennai - 600 018.
.. Appellants in both the W.As -VsBanu ... Respondent in W.A.No.86/2015 Manjula ... Respondent in W.A.No.87/2015 order in W.P.Nos.18264 and 23018 of 2014 dated 05.08.2014 and 26.08.2014 respectively.
W.A.No.88 of 2015 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by Secretary to Government Forest and Environment Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests having Office at Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet Chennai 600 015.
3.The District Forest Officer, Social Forestry Division, Vellore District.
.. Appellants -Vs2/5
M.Mani ....
Respondent order in W.P.No.19652 of 2014 dated 11.08.2014 In all W.As.
For Appellants :
Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan Additional Government Pleader For Respondents :
Not ready in notice C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. KUMARESH BABU, J.) The private respondents in these intra Court appeals had approached this Court seeking for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to count 50% of the service rendered by them prior to the regularisation for the purpose of grant of pensionary benefits.
2. When these writ appeals were taken up, the learned Judge, following an order of the Division Bench of this Court made in W.A.Nos.27 and 28 of 2012 dated 13.02.2012, which had been confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, had allowed the writ petitions and had issued directions to pass orders within a period of twelve weeks.
3/5
3. It is submitted that the learned Special Government Pleader that, in respect of three writ appeals viz., W.A.Nos.67, 86 and 87 of 2015, orders have been complied with and hence no further orders are required to be passed.
4. As regards the other writ appeals viz., W.A.Nos.68 and 88 of 2015 are concerned, since already the learned Judge had followed the order of the earlier Division Bench judgment, which has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, we do not find any infirmity in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. The appellants are directed to comply with the orders passed in the respective writ petitions within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above observations, these writ appeals are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.K.,J..) (K.B.,J.) 31.07.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST 4/5
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
KST W.A.Nos.67, 68, 86, 87 and 88 of 2015 31.07.2023 5/5