N.Santhanam v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.04.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.9110 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.10043 of 2017 N.Santhanam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State rep by The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar Office, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai - 600 119.

2.K.Parasuraman ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the letter Na.Ka.No.2754/2016/Aa1 dated 06.01.2017 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.V.Ilamvazhuthi For Respondents : Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, Additional Government Pleader (R1) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to with draw the Writ Petition with liberty to file an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Office as against the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the Revenue Divisional Office in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

va To

1. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar Office, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai - 600 119.

+1cc to Mr.S.V.S. Ilamvazhuthi, Advocate Sr. 2286 W.P.No.9110 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.10043 of 2017 AD(CO) VR(18/04/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/