Madras High CourtWP/1032/2024dismissed

T.Suganya v. The Governmnt Of Tamilnadu,

2024-01-18Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN T.Suganya ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu represented by Secretary to School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

3. The Joint Director of School Education, DPI Compund, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

4. The Chief Educational Officer, Erode District, Erode-2.

5. The District Educational Officer, Erode Educational District, Erode-2.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue the compassionate appointment to the petitioner for death of her father (V.Tulasimani) dated 06.05.2006.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents to issue the compassionate appointment to the petitioner for death of her father (V.Tulasimani) dated 06.05.2006.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. The petitioner's father was working as P.G.Assistant in the 6th respondent School and died due to illness, on 06.05.2006. At the time of his demise, the petitioner had completed 10th standard. Immediately, her mother applied for appointment, on compassionate ground. Her mother was directed to furnish additional documents to consider her application seeking appointment on compassionate ground.

4. Further, by the communication dated 06.06.2008, the fifth respondent sought some additional documents from the 6th respondent. Therefore, the petitioner's mother submitted all the certificates. Thereafter, it was not considered and rejected. Once again, the petitioner submitted an application seeking compassionate appointment. It was rejected by an order dated 06.07.2016 by the second respondent. Consequent to that order, the 5th respondent passed an order, thereby rejected the request made by the petitioner. However, the petitioner did not challenge the same.

5. After a period of seven years, once again, the petitioner made another application seeking appointment on compassionate ground. Therefore, the relief sought for in this petition cannot be considered and this writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.01.2024 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mn

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1.The Secretary to School Education Department, The Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

3. The Joint Director of School Education, DPI Compund, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

4. The Chief Educational Officer, Erode District, Erode-2.

5. The District Educational Officer, Erode Educational District, Erode-2.

18.01.2024