← Library
Madras High CourtWP/968/2023disposed of

D.Sridhar v. Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation

2023-01-12Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.01.2023 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE Writ Petition No.968 of 2023 D.Sridhar ..... Petitioner -Versus1.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Rep. by The Managing Director, 3/137, Salamedu, Valudhareddy Post, Villupuram - 605602.

2.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Vellore Regional Office, Rangapuram, Vellore 632 009. 3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600002.

.... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest amounts to the Provident Fund, Service Gratuity, Leave Salary at the rate of 4% per annum for 23 months of delayed payment and for eight months delay for the voluntary retirement compensation amount on lines with the order dated 12.06.2015 of the Division Bench of this Court made in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 and as adopted in order dated 24.03.2021 in W.P.No.506 of 2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ishak For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal

ORDER

The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he has been disbursed with the provident fund, gratuity and leave salary by the respondent/Transport Corporation belatedly. He has voluntarily retired from service and thereafter, the aforementioned amounts, according to him, were paid belatedly. In such circumstances, due to the delayed payment of the aforesaid sums, he has sought for interest by giving a representation on 15.12.2022. Since the representation has not been considered till date, he has filed this writ petition. 2.

Heard Mr.N.Ishak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, learned standing counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

3.

On instructions, learned standing counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation would submit that the petitioner's voluntary retirement was accepted by the respondent/Transport

Corporation only on the condition that he will not claim interest for any belated payment of the retirement benefits. However, the same is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.

No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.

For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs respondents 1 and 2 to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 15.12.2022 seeking for payment of interest for the belated payment of retirement benefits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

12.01.2023 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No mmi To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., 3/137, Salamedu, Valudhareddy Post, Villupuram - 605602.

2.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Vellore Regional Office, Rangapuram, Vellore 632 009.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600002.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., mmi 12.01.2023