Dhanasekari Ammal v. The Government Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.08.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI, J.

W.P.No.12237 of 2011 Dhanasekari Ammal

...Petitioner

vs

1. The Government of Puducherry, Represented by the Deputy Director, the Local Administration Department, Puducherry.

2. The Director Panchayat Administration, Local Administration Department, Puducherry. ... Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in proceedings No.4909/LAD/CP/A3/2011 dated 06.05.2011 and quash the same illegal, incompetent, irregular, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and direct the respondents to recognize the petitioner to the post of Chairman/ President of Villianoor Commune Panchayat.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Purushothaman for Raghavachari For Respondents : Mr.A.V.Ramalingam Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following endorsement in the writ petition to the effect that: " petition became infructuous, hence nothing survives"

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tta To

1. The Deputy Director, Government of Puducherry, the Local Administration Department, Puducherry.

2. The Director Panchayat Administration, Local Administration Department, Puducherry.

+1cc to M/s.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, S.R.No.67388 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.67711 W.P.No.12237 of 2011 CNR(CO) CS/30/09/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/