Senthil Kumar v. Kaliyan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE SA No.1046 of 2002

1. Senthil Kumar

2. Panchalai ...

Appellants versus

1. Kaliyan

2. Murugesan ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram passed in A.S. No.212/97, on 27.07.99 reversing the judgment and decree of the Additional District Munsif - I, Ulundurpet, passed in O.S. No.183/95, dated 29.04.1997.

For Appellants : Mr.L.Prabhakar For Respondents : R1 - Served - No appearance Not ready in notice reg- R2

JUDGMENT

(Heard Video Conference) The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today.

The learned counsel for the appellants reports "no instructions" in this matter. According to him, despite his best efforts, he has been unable to contact his client. The appellants has also not effected Substituted Service through Paper Publication for service of notice on the second respondent, as directed by this Court earlier. It can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

this Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

2. The Additional District Munsif - I, Ulundurpet.

Copy to :

The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras.

SA No.1046 of 2002 KV(CO) HS(19/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/