Madras High CourtCRP/1372/2008dismissed as infructuous

R.Sumathi v. Sathanna

2020-01-02Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 02.01.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN and MP.No.1 of 2008 R.Sumathi ... Petitioner

Versus

1.Sathanna 2.Veeramani 3.Dhanapal ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control), Act,1960, against the Order dated 30.11.2006 passed in R.C.A.No.28 of 2006 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sub-Court, Mannargudi confirming the Order in RCOP.No.4 of 2001, dated 03.03.2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi.

For petitioner : Mr.Om Sairam For Respondents : Mr.M.V.Venkateshan (for R1) : No Appearance - R2 & R3

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petition has now become infructuous and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle.

2.In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the revision petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

02.01.2020 Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking/Non-Speaking order klt To 1.The Rent Control Appellate Authority, Sub-Court, Mannargudi. 2.The District Munsif Court, Mannargudi.

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., klt and MP.No.1 of 2008 02.01.2020