Arumugam v. Murugesa Pillai,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.04.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1978 of 2002 & C.M.P.No.16926 of 2002 1.Arumugam 2.Perumal ... Appellants/ Defendants Vs Murugesa Pillai ... Respondent/ Plaintiff PRAYER:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the decree and judgment dated of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam dated 21.06.2002 and made in A.S.No.18 of 2000 Fast Track Court No.II, A.S.No.55 of 2002 confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.15 of 1985 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gingee.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption for dismissal today. There is no representation on the side of the Appellants. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 09.04.2021, there was no representation on the side of the Appellants.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent has also filed a memo as early as on 18.11.2011 for the death of the respondent who died on 11.03.2021. Till date, steps have also not been taken by the learned counsel for the Appellants to bring on record the legal representatives for the deceased respondent.

3. It can now be inferred that the Appellants are not interested in prosecuting this second appeal. Accordingly, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

second appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nl To

1. The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam

2. The District Munsif Court, Gingee

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras-104.

S.A.No.1978 of 2002 CNR(CO) CS/16/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/