← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1103/2019dismissed for nonprosecution

P.Ganesan v. The District Collector

2025-04-16Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.No.1103 of 2019 and WMP No.1247 of 2019 P.Ganesan

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The District Collector/The Inspector of Panchayats, Collectorate of Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

2. Assistant Director (Audit), Rural Development (Audit), Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

3. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Kollidam Union, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

4. The Deputy Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Kollidam Union, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

5. The Village Secretary, Erukkur Revenue Village and Post, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

...Respondents

1/4

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to Na.Ka.No.1363/2013/A4 dated 14.12.2018 issued by the Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Kollildam Union, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District, the 3rd respondent herein and quash the same. For Petitioner :

No representation For Respondents :

Mr.M.Rajendran AGP For R.1,R.2, R.4 and R.5 Mr.S.Suresh Kumar For R.3

O R D E R

When the matter was called on 13.03.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned to 26.03.2025. Again when the matter was called on 26.03.2025, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, Registry was directed to list the matter today i.e., 16.04.2025 under the caption "for dismissal".

2. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing at 11.30 a.m, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it is clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence this Court has no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for non2/4

prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16.04.2025 sr Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order To

1. The District Collector/The Inspector of Panchayats, Collectorate of Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

2. Assistant Director (Audit), Rural Development (Audit), Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

3. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Kollidam Union, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

4. The Deputy Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Kollidam Union, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

5. The Village Secretary, Erukkur Revenue Village and Post, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District.

3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

sr 16.04.2025 4/4