Madras High CourtSA/2169/2002dismissed for default

Chinnayya Gounder, v. Rajamanikkam,

2019-09-30Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.2169 of 2002

1. Chinnayya Gounder

2. ElumalaiGounder ... Appellants Vs.

1. Rajamanikkam

2. Ammasi

3. Achuthan

4. Hariraman

5. Kumutha

6. Harikesavan

7. Vasantha

8. Pachaiappan

9. Thenmozhi(minor)

10. Usha (minor) (Minors rep.by Guardian Mother Vasantha)

11. Bhoopathi

12. Parasuraman

13. Yasodhai

14. Nadupappa 15.Bharathi

16. Pachaiappan ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.40 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Panruti dated 21.12.2001 reversing the judgment passed in O.S.No.779 of 1989 dated 25.07.1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Panruti.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.R.Meenal for R8 : No appearance for R6, R7, R11 and R12

JUDGMENT

In the last hearing, i.e., on 27.09.2019, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter has been posted today (30.09.2019) under the caption, '' for dismissal '' .

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Today also, no representation for the appellants. It is represented that the first appellant died. So far, steps not taken. The appellant No.2 called absent and set exparte. The learned counsel for the respondent No.8 present. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Panruti.

2. The District Munsif Court, Panruti.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.R.Subramanian , Advocate SR.No. 83864 S.A.No.2169 of 2002 A.SK(02/12/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/