S.Kumar v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.02.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU W.P. No. 4017 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 4752 of 2020 S. Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Tahsildar Coimbatore North Tahsildar Office Coimbatore.

2. V.Ravikumar ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the First Respondent from conducting enquiry based on the representation dated 06.05.2019 made by the Second Respondent in proceedings No. Na.Ka.No.7446/2018/A1, dated 26.08.2019 and passed by the First Respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr. A.Sriram For Respondents:

Mr. J.Purushothaman (For R1) Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

When it is pointed out that the order which is impugned in the Writ Petition is merely a show cause notice and the Petitioner could be aggrieved only when a final decision entailing adverse civil consequences to the Petitioner is taken as an ultimate outcome of the same, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the Petitioner challenge the final order, if he is aggrieved by the same and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting such liberty. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar maya/tta/sj To

1. The Tahsildar, Coimbatore North, Tahsildar Office, Coimbatore.

+1 CC to Mr.A. Sriram, Advocate sr 14817 +1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 15142.

W.P. No. 4017 of 2020 SPD(CO) SP(04/06/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/