Madras High CourtCRP/4132/2008dismissed for default

M.A.D.Krishnasamy v. V.Dharmalingam

2019-02-20Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.02.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P(NPD)Nos.4132 & 4133 of 2008 C.R.P.(NPD)No.4132 of 2008:

1.M.A.D.Krishnasamy

2. Karthika

3. Devi

4. Kavitha

5. Ramesh Babu

6. Minor.Suresh Babu .. Petitioners/Respondents Vs.

1. V.Dharmalingam 2.Shanmugam Pillai

3. S.R.Maduranayagam

4. Loganathan

5. Thulasiammal

6. Meenakshi

7. Ranganayaki

8. Chandravathi

9. Thilagavathi

10. Vijayalakshmi

11. Savithri

12. Nellambal

13. Ramalingam

14. Banumathi

15. R.Dayalan

16. Gomathi

17. Selvi.Devika

18. Kamaraj @ Raja

19. Rathna

20. Gandhimani .. Respondents/Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 21.12.2005, made in A.O.P.No.53 of 1995, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition. C.R.P.(NPD)No.4132 of 2008:

1.M.A.D.Krishnasamy

2. Karthika

3. Devi

4. Kavitha

5. Ramesh Babu

6. Minor.Suresh Babu ... Petitioners/Petitioners Vs.

1. Loganathan

2. Thulasiammal

3. Meenakshi

4. Ranganayaki

5. Chandravathi

6. Thilagavathi

7. Vijayalakshmi

8. Savithri

9. V.Dharmalingam

10. Shanmugam Pillai

11. S.R.Maduranayagam ... Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 21.12.2005, made in A.O.P.No.40 of 1996, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners in both revisions : Mr.P.Raja For Respondents in both revisions : Mr.K.M.Jayapal

C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners submitted that inspite of the notice sent to the revision petitioners, there is no instructions from them and hence, reported that no instructions. Since, these revisions are pending from the year 2008, and it appears that the petitioners are not interested to proceed the case further. Hence, this Court is inclined to dismiss these revision petitions.

2. Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

20.02.2019 Index: Yes/No Speaking/ Non-Speaking ssi To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court.

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

ssi C.R.P(NPD)Nos.4132 & 4133 of 2008 20.02.2018