D.Singaravelu v. Amudha Naicker And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL SA NO. 526 OF 2002 and CMP No. 4788 of 2003

1. D.Singaravelu S/o. Dharmalingam Mudaliar 8-A, C.N.Annadurai St.

Kancheerpuram - 3.

Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff Vs

1. Amudha Naicker S/o. Munuswamy Naickeer

2. Thirumavalavan S/o. Thangavel Naickeer both residing at Selimedu Village & Post, Kancheerpuram Taluk Respondent(s) / Respondents / Defendants PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated November 25, 1994 passed in A.S.No.40 of 1992 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Kancheerpuam, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated September 8, 1990 passed in O.S.No.725 of 1984 by the District Munsif, Kancheepuram by allowing the Second Appeal with costs throughout by decreeing the suit in O.S.No.725 of 1984.

For Appellant(s):

Ms.Vidhya Sree for M/s.A.Sumathi For Respondent(s):

M/s.Y.Jothish Chander For R1 R2 - Died [vide Cmp] R3 - Dismissed - Vide Court Order Dt. 14/02/2023

JUDGMENT

Ms.Vidhya Sree, representing Ms.A.Sumathi, learned Counsel on record for the Appellant is before this Court and Mr.Y.Jothish Chander, learned Counsel on record for the First Respondent is before this Court through Video Conferencing mode.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant reports no instructions and to that effect she has made an endorsement in the case file. Scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

03-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes bkn To:

1. Sub-Judge, Kancheerpuam.

2. District Munsif, Kancheerpuram.

R.SAKTHIVEL J.

bkn SA NO. 526 OF 2002 03-03-2026